Google| Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 04/13/2014 20:00 (04/13/2014 14:00) |
| Message-ID | <130420141400493359%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (53m) > nospam |
In article <qjalk9pjphb1o7aatsva0ti1rsqajhu8nb@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:
once again, this isn't about *me*, it's about the apps.Tony CoopernospamTony CooperTony Coopernospam
So, you weren't very good with Photoshop. It's a program for grown-ups, so don't feel badly.
back to your usual ad hominems.
i'm *very* good with photoshop, not that it matters. this isn't about me.
If you were *very* good with Photoshop, but spend far less time now with LR, you were either meticulous but slow in PS or are being sloppy in LR.
nonsense.Tony Coopernospam
Unless, of course, your photos were so bad when you used PS that they needed a lot of work and you've now improved your shots so they don't require as much work.
also nonsense.Tony Coopernospam
At the same skill level in both LR and PS, some time might be saved in LR with a large volume of shots, but "far less time" is a bogus claim.
it's not bogus at all.Tony Coopernospam
Of course, all we have is your word for it for any claim.
feel free to refute whatever i say with proof, not insults. you can't, which is why you resort to insults.
The only way to provide proof is to see what you do with images. So, produce something to work with and I'll see about proof from there.
second of all, posting images doesn't prove anything one way or the other because the benefits of lightroom are outside of what you might see in an image. you would have no way of knowing whether someone spent 10 seconds or 10 hours on an image, no matter what software they used.
anyone who actually uses lightroom would know this.
04/05/2014-
