Google| Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 04/20/2014 02:47 (04/19/2014 20:47) |
| Message-ID | <br56l9dk3pr53ad6rqer64sq2vjbk5febo@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (6h & 23m) |
On 19 Apr 2014 21:02:30 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
Sandman
In article <vth5l9hij8o3u2d4beor72e6i3fabd7s8n@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
I see you - as I predicted - snipped the examples of you responding inflammatory to nospam and not at all to Savageduck, in spite of both having matched opinions about a product.Sure. I usually trim the fat from posts and just reply to what I want to comment on.
Oh. You didn't say that. I just went by exactly what you said. I guess we just have to add one more thing about English you don't understand: how to form a sentence. You don't understand the difference between "substantiate your agenda" and "substantiate that you have an agenda".SandmanWhich is why you'll probably snip all this away and pretend I didn't substantiate your agenda... once again.Tony Cooper
You substantiated my agenda?
Indeed.Tony CooperSandman
In other words, you proved that my alleged agenda is correct?
No, I substantiated its existence.
I do a lot of "classic" stuff, don't I?Tony CooperSandman
If I had one it would reassuring to know that you think it's correct.
Semantic word games - classic last resort for a troll.
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
04/05/2014-
