Google| Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 04/07/2014 03:06 (04/06/2014 21:06) |
| Message-ID | <060420142106532234%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Bob |
In article <QrWdnXLlOMKlddzOnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@swcp.com>, Bob <bob@spam-place.com>wrote:
or the same number of photos in 1/10 to 1/100th the time.BobnospamBobnospamAll that said, when you're serious about photography and raw you should seriously get away from Linux and The Gimp.Jeffery Small
Why would you write this?
he wrote it because it's true.
So you're both saying that it's not possibile to produce good photos using Linux and Gimp?
nobody said that it's impossible.
Good, because it sure looked like that's what you were saying.nospamBob
what is being said is that the gimp is inefficient, slow and clunky, with the alternatives leaving it in the dust.
Meaning you'll produce, what, 10x as many photos of equal or better quality than anyone using Gimp? 100 times? What do you mean by 'leaving it in the dust'?
that's what more efficient means.
Does it bother you that someone else might use Gimp and be happy with it?nope.
if someone likes making things more difficult than it needs to be, go for it.
just don't fault others for pointing out that there are much easier and simpler ways to do things.
04/05/2014-
