Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | Floyd L. Davidson |
Date | 04/08/2014 02:12 (04/07/2014 16:12) |
Message-ID | <874n247k80.fld@barrow.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (25m) > Floyd L. Davidson Savageduck (2h & 17m) > Floyd L. Davidson Eric Stevens (3h & 47m) |
nospamI've never owned a copy myself. I have never had it on a computer at home. I have never "used" it in the sense that it was my normal editor.
In article <878urg7kx4.fld@barrow.com>, Floyd L. Davidson <floyd@apaflo.com>wrote:nospamFloyd L. DavidsonnospamPeterNAlan BrowneFloyd L. Davidson
And as time goes on and the capability set of Photoshop increases more quickly than the Gimp's poor record of catching up ... well...
Tell us about how great it is to have only a choice between "bicubic sharper" and "bicubic smoother" for filters when resampling an image either down for the web or up for printing!
Are you talking about Photoshop CC? There are quit a few more choices. And there is PerfectResize, which has completely different algorithms.
keep in mind floyd has never used photoshop (and readily admits it).
According to nospam.
according to *you*.