Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | Savageduck |
Date | 04/17/2014 19:31 (04/17/2014 10:31) |
Message-ID | <2014041710314737011-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (2h & 49m) Sandman (8h & 32m) |
nospamActually, most of us who are regulars here and who from time to time post samples of our work, are curious as to what you actually shoot and consider good results of your workflow.
In article <li0uk9d1gcqij3hjnqvn5edahqo45f4k2h@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:nospamTony CoopernospamSandmanTony Cooper
You forgot to include a quote of nospam citing HOW it improved his workflow.
Ah, but nospam plays it close to the vest. He makes numerous allusions to the great improvements LR has made in his workflow (which must have been positively buggywhipish before to improve as much as he intimates), but he never really gets specific. nospam thinks "*much*" or "*a lot* or "*far* less time" is description enough. He allegedly takes photographs and processes them, but that's all that can be squeezed out of him.
i was very specific and you're about the last person with whom i want to share any of them.
You don't have any communication with me. We are not in a personal conversation, an email exchange, or a Skype call. You post publicly in a group where anyone who wants to reads your posts. What you post here is what you post for me to be the first or the last person you are sharing with.
you're the one who keeps insisting that i post something, so obviously you are very interested in what i shoot.