Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 04/19/2014 00:51 (04/19/2014 10:51) |
Message-ID | <fha3l99et3as32rfbvqin8h82rdfc5i8v2@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (16h & 44m) > Eric Stevens |
SandmanThis a trick which you have tried several times already. Nospam issues a cloud of statements, somebody eventually works out what he is trying to say and summarises it in a single concise statement, you then challenge them to tell you where nospam actually said that.
In article <vmc1l9918vhne5hdqeb93p7oj034qe6ve0@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:Eric StevensSandmanClassic troll diversion. You have yet to tell us how it is *evident* that:1. It has improved his workflow 2. His workflow was previously ineffectiveEric Stevens
That nospam claims this is evident from his writings.
Classic unsubstantiated claim. Please quote nospam claiming that his workflow was previously ineffective, please. Merely claiming stuff won't get you anywhere.
Have you not noticed the paen of praise for the enormous effect Light Room has had on his work flow emerging from nospam?Dear me! Have just joined this thread?Sandman
You have yet to point to a quote from nospam saying his previous workflow was ineffective. A tool making something more effective does not equate to the former method being ineffective.
--SandmanEric StevensSandmanEric StevensSandmanI am. Making fun of trolls on usenet is something I have time to do before we go out or at night when get back.Tony Cooper
Take a break, then.
Why? I enjoy making you look like a fool.
At the moment you seem to be rehearsing in front of a mirror.
Best endorsement I could get.
From your mirror?
From you.