Google| Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 04/14/2014 08:18 (04/14/2014 02:18) |
| Message-ID | <140420140218097732%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
In article <95qmk9hf7p164s1nvmmkvd6khjii362n60@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:
you'd better tell adobe that.Tony CooperTony Coopernospam
If you think that the new Healing Brush features are a equal substitute for the Cloning Tool, then you evidently never understood how to use PS's Clone Tool effectively.
i never said it was equal. what i said is that it works quite well in most situations and in many cases, it's easier and more effective.
No you didn't. That's a complete fabrication. What you would call a "lie". What you said was:
"so does adobe, which is why they included a clone tool in lightroom."
It is not a clone tool.
<http://www.image-space.com/Lightroom_Tips_Tricks/Develop_Module_Tips/cl one_heal_tools/files/switch_clone_heal.jpg>
It does not replicate what the clone tool is capable of. You have to dick around with it to get it to use the area you want it to use which makes it less effective. Useful for some things, but not as effective, and certainly not easier to use.wrong again. it's *you* who needs to dick around with it.
the rest of the world doesn't because in nearly all situations, what lightroom does is faster and easier to use.
and since when do you even use lightroom to edit images? are you still doing it all in photoshop and then using lightroom just to catalog it?
04/05/2014-
