Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 04/19/2014 00:54 (04/19/2014 10:54) |
Message-ID | <u3b3l9ldmsjekq33ua7vucvs6rj3vmovid@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (47m) Sandman (16h & 44m) > Eric Stevens |
nospam'Effectiveness' or 'ineffectiveness' is a matter of relativity.
In article <vmc1l9918vhne5hdqeb93p7oj034qe6ve0@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensSandmanSandman
Classic troll diversion. You have yet to tell us how it is *evident* that:1. It has improved his workflow 2. His workflow was previously ineffectiveEric Stevens
That nospam claims this is evident from his writings.
Classic unsubstantiated claim. Please quote nospam claiming that his workflow was previously ineffective, please. Merely claiming stuff won't get you anywhere.
Have you not noticed the paen of praise for the enormous effect Light Room has had on his work flow emerging from nospam?
that doesn't mean what i did before was ineffective. that's nothing but a straw man.
before lightroom, my workflow was the best it could be at the time, given what was available.And compared with your post-Lightroom work flow it was relatively ineffective.
after lightroom, my workflow became more productive.I can accept that. --