Skip to main content
news

Re: Any Minolta/Sony users ...

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP?
FromEric Stevens
Date04/19/2014 00:54 (04/19/2014 10:54)
Message-ID<u3b3l9ldmsjekq33ua7vucvs6rj3vmovid@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
Followupsnospam (47m)
Sandman (16h & 44m) > Eric Stevens

On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:36:28 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

nospam
In article <vmc1l9918vhne5hdqeb93p7oj034qe6ve0@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:

Sandman
Classic troll diversion. You have yet to tell us how it is *evident* that:

1. It has improved his workflow 2. His workflow was previously ineffective

Eric Stevens
That nospam claims this is evident from his writings.

Sandman
Classic unsubstantiated claim. Please quote nospam claiming that his workflow was previously ineffective, please. Merely claiming stuff won't get you anywhere.

Eric Stevens
Have you not noticed the paen of praise for the enormous effect Light Room has had on his work flow emerging from nospam?

nospam
that doesn't mean what i did before was ineffective. that's nothing but a straw man.

'Effectiveness' or 'ineffectiveness' is a matter of relativity.

before lightroom, my workflow was the best it could be at the time, given what was available.

And compared with your post-Lightroom work flow it was relatively ineffective.

after lightroom, my workflow became more productive.

I can accept that. --

Regards,

Eric Stevens

nospam (47m)
Sandman (16h & 44m) > Eric Stevens