Google| Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 04/08/2014 04:40 (04/07/2014 22:40) |
| Message-ID | <070420142240152463%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Floyd L. Davidson |
In article <87vbuk60x5.fld@barrow.com>, Floyd L. Davidson <floyd@apaflo.com>wrote:
try reading it again, this time slowly, before you stick your foot in your mouth any further than it already is.Floyd L. DavidsonnospamEric StevensFloyd L. Davidson
Clark Vision have published articles describing their tests with all these things using Photoshop. See for example http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/image-restoration2/index.html>
Read it a little closer Eric, Roger Clark did not use PhotoShop for Richardson-Lucy Deconvolutional sharpening, he also didn't even mention the Wavelet sharpening that I have previously commented on.
read it closer yourself. what he *didn't* use was the gimp.
Nobody said he used GIMP. But Eric said he used Photoshop, which was not even close to true.
roger said he used photoshop cs5 for two of the three comparisons (unsharp mask and smart sharpen) and imagesplus for one comparison (richardson-lucy), with the blurring for the tests using photoshop's gaussian blur.
in other words, most things were done with photoshop, and had he been aware of a richardson-lucy plug-in (they do exist), he could have done all of it in photoshop.
so eric's statement that he used photoshop is very close to true.
04/05/2014-
