nospam
In article <lipagb3gre@news1.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:

several people have told you that you are wrong about lightroom. your statement saying it's only for event photographers is proof you don't know much about it.

PeterN
Here's another question that you will not answer.

nospam
of course i will.

PeterN
Just where did I say that LR is only or event photographers.

nospam
In article <lin3rt02f2m@news1.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:

PeterN
Yes, but not for all photographers. for event photographers and folks who shoot a set of images under similar lighting conditions, it is fine. You are missing that LW is not an either/or tool. And most of us here are not fooled by you "most" ----- bullshit.

nospam
and savageduck's reply:

In article <2014041616593967964-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:

Yes, but not for all photographers. for event photographers and folks who shoot a set of images under similar lighting conditions, it is fine.

PeterN
Where did you come up with that idea? LR handles batch adjustments in much the same way ACR handles batch adjustments. Its usefulness and functionality is not limited to "event photographers and folks who shoot a set of images under similar lighting conditions". I certainly don't use LR for batch processing, and I am quite capable of taking advantage of the tools and features it provides one image at a time.