Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | Alan Browne |
Date | 04/22/2014 23:22 (04/22/2014 17:22) |
Message-ID | <hpCdnU-eFdc0QMvOnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
nospamA visible difference? None at all. None in the images. None in the difference.
In article <b-qdnUuFUvwIp8nOnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca>wrote:nospamPeterNAlan Browne
The only time you might see a difference would be if there were colors in the LAB spectrum that are not in the RGB spectrum, and those differences would rarely be noticable in a photograph.
A good point - but nospam's contention is conversion differences.
Let's color the situation. The files were taken from raw, reduced in size, saved as TIFF in each RGB and Lab. Re-loaded and compared (differenced). There is not a hint of delta.
http://tinyurl.com/m35p59t RGB
http://tinyurl.com/mldetvx Lab
http://tinyurl.com/mvl6vwj Diff
there's a difference there too.
i did: image/duplicate, append -converted to the name. image/mode/lab image/mode/rgb image/calculations, original on top, converted below, subtract modeShow your results.
optionally, just before the calculation step, switch between the two images while looking at the histogram palette. there's a difference. then do the calculation step.