Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/14/2014 20:41 (04/14/2014 20:41) |
Message-ID | <slrnlkob29.tho.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Followups | Tony Cooper (3h & 30m) > Sandman |
False logic. If person A usually walks to the store and person B suggests to use a bicycle to get there faster and bring back more products, then the veracity of that claim doesn't hinge on person B providing examples of his own endevours with a bicycle. He may not even own or need a bicycle and the claim would still remain true.Tony Coopernospam
The only way to provide proof is to see what you do with images. So, produce something to work with and I'll see about proof from there.
once again, this isn't about *me*, it's about the apps.second of all, posting images doesn't prove anything one way or the other because the benefits of lightroom are outside of what you might see in an image. you would have no way of knowing whether someone spent 10 seconds or 10 hours on an image, no matter what software they used.Tony Cooper
Exactly. That's why you don't know if a change to LR would leave someone all that extra time to do something else.
You're making all about you because - evidently - it's improved your previously ineffective workflow so you think everyone else must benefit by doing what you say you do.How is this "evident", Tony? nospam has said exactly nothing about his own experience with Lightroom, or if he even uses it. He has made claims about one software product being more effective at a specific task than another software product. His claim is backed by many others, and even backed by the very existence of the product in the first place, given the fact that both are made by the same company and one is a specialized product for the very task under discussion.