Skip to main content
news

Re: Any Minolta/Sony users ...

PeterN
SubjectRe: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP?
FromPeterN
Date04/17/2014 01:23 (04/16/2014 19:23)
Message-ID<lin3e802eq7@news1.newsguy.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
Followupsnospam (17h & 32m) > PeterN

On 4/13/2014 8:02 PM, nospam wrote:

nospam
In article <liemdj01e48@news1.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:

why spend more time than necessary doing something?

Eric Stevens
Why learn a new way of doing something when you can laready do it without much apparent difficulty?

nospam
because the productivity increase is huge and the amount of time to learn something new is small (often negligible).

PeterN
That comment incontrovertibly demonstrates your lack of knowledge of Photoshop.

nospam
no, what it shows is your lack of knowledge of lightroom.

ask anyone who has used both.

PeterN
You obviously don't. If you did, you owuld not have made that diotic statement.

nospam
i do and it's not idiotic.

ask those who use both apps. you won't do that because you know you'll have to admit you're full of shit when you get the same answers.

PeterN
So now you know what I do. My original claim stands. Your statement about the learning curve of PC & LR could only be made either by somone who has not really used them, or who is a compplete bullshiter. I was wrong in giving you thebenefit of the doubt.

nospam
no. you were just wrong, and still are.

as i said, ask those who use both apps. they'll tell you what i'm telling you.

I use both, and I agree that LR streamlines the workflow. But PS is not easy to learn, and I had a short learning curve to adapt to LR. But since you like quick and dirty processing, why don't you use the many color curves in LAB. Ater all you can apply a curve into a channel in LAB and get far more precise results than you can in ACR.

-- PeterN

nospam (17h & 32m) > PeterN