Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | PeterN |
Date | 04/22/2014 02:14 (04/21/2014 20:14) |
Message-ID | <lj4c8802ose@news1.newsguy.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (1h & 57m) > PeterN |
Eric StevensFor all practical photographic purposes there is no visible differences. Alan Browne has posted some examples in alt.photography. I went a step further, using Alan's images I applied a small curve adjustment in LAB that should have brought some of the darker areas into a portion of the LAB color space that is outside the gamut of the RGB space. I converted the LAB image back into RGB, and saved it together with a copy of the LAB image. nospam was invited by both Alan And myself to duplicate the experiment, and has given nothing but transparent excuses for his failure to post a duplicable experiment.
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:10:29 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:nospamEric Stevens
In article <4v89l9l7jfpgd98oiu0thal6gdao3aab9t@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:Eric Stevensnospam
I've never said it was not destructive.
you did ask why a conversion to and from lab would matter.
I don't think I asked that. I have asked why converting to Lab would require more conversions than to any other working color space. You still haven't told me.