Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | Savageduck |
Date | 04/14/2014 06:46 (04/13/2014 21:46) |
Message-ID | <2014041321465622781-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Tony CooperTony, while the LR tools might not be quite the equal of some found in PS, you should check on the capability available. With LR5 you have the option to switch between a *Healing tool* & a *Clone tool*, all you have to do is look a little closer to find the option and select what you need for the job. < https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_650.jpg >
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 22:33:21 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:nospamTony Cooper
In article <oufmk9tr76qu1959vsdqh6joged9pu4hbu@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:nospamlightroom was written to increase productivity of photographers by providing all of the common tasks photographers do in one place, without burdening them with stuff they'll rarely or never use (although there are ways to do those on the off chance they do).Tony Cooper
it succeeds in doing that.
What is the "burden" of features of a program that someone doesn't use? A burden is something that slows you down or causes you some inconvenience.
the burden is with the app they do use.Tony Coopernospam
PS allows working in CMYK. I've never worked in CMYK. Is it a burden for me to use a program that contains a feature that I don't use?
why include what isn't used? the user pays for it and the code takes up space even though it won't be used and it is potentially confusing if the user doesn't know what it's for.
lightroom streamlines a user's workflow, which makes the user more productive. again, ask those who use lightroom or why adobe wrote it.Tony Coopernospam
LR does not have the "stuff" that many people do use.
completely wrong. statements like this shows just how little you understand about what lightroom does and how it works.Tony Coopernospam
I think it's a burden to have to open a file in PS to be able to use the clone tool.
so does adobe, which is why they included a clone tool in lightroom.Tony Coopernospam
It's a burden I'm willing to live with because of the other advantages of using LR, but the idea that we are burdened if there are features we don't use in a program is just more bullshit.
again, statements like this shows just how little you understand about what lightroom does and how it works.
If you think that the new Healing Brush features are a equal substitute for the Cloning Tool, then you evidently never understood how to use PS's Clone Tool effectively.