Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | Savageduck |
Date | 04/17/2014 02:02 (04/16/2014 17:02) |
Message-ID | <201404161702414908-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (48m) |
Eric StevensLR isn't a particularly good text editor.
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:30:38 -0400, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:Tony CooperEric Stevens
On 16 Apr 2014 13:32:52 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanTony Cooper
In article <rf8rk9d0ano827c39flp812opslje0psni@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:SandmanTony CooperTony CooperSandman
I provided three cites - gleaned just from the last two days of posting - where he (Oh, here's your word) substantiates that he does use LR.
Something that has not been in question. Classic troll diversion.
Oh, your "...or if he even uses it" seems you questioned it. But, then, all I have to go on is you rather odd way of using English. Most (yeah, "most") people would take "or if he even uses it" to mean you question if it's known he's been using it.
Classic troll diversion. You have yet to tell us how it is *evident* that:
1. It has improved his workflow 2. His workflow was previously ineffective
OK...just for shits and giggles I'll concede this point and revise my statements:
1. The use of LR has not improved nospam's workflow at all. It's as creaky and useless as it was before.
2. His workflow was not ineffective before, it was simply the best that could be done under the GIGO rule.
I'll let nospam correct whichever one of us that he wants to correct.
Shouldn't he use Light Room to do it?