Google| Subject | Re: Sandman fan fiction digest 144 / 2015-12-16 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/17/2015 23:23 (12/17/2015 23:23) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-674602db1308e645224c42772769a2a1@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (2h & 5m) > Sandman |
In article <D2988023.6742D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
I already did, remember?SnitSandman
[1056] Do not even know what I am being accused of lying (86) about...
I'll try to be more clear. This is your claim:Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>"The comment is not from anyone in my family...""The comment" was a comment on a web page that was made by this profile account:Snit
A claim you make with no support. You will neither support it nor rescind it, going against your own claim that you will do so. In other words you are breaking your word.
<
>Note the link in the status bar.
As I have, indeed.Sandman
<https://www.facebook.com/anne.glasser.37>Thus, you are claiming that this is not your wife.Snit
You say when you make a claim you should back it or take it back.
Which are you going to do with this claim? The answer: neither. You will simply break your word. You will lie. It is what you do.Another lie from Snit.
Here's the lie of yours I have quoted and proven:
Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"The comment is not from anyone in my family..."
-- Sandman
12/15/2015-
-
-
