Skip to main content
news

Re: Snit digest 190 / 2015-...

Slimer
SubjectRe: Snit digest 190 / 2015-12-22
FromSlimer
Date12/22/2015 14:37 (12/22/2015 08:37)
Message-ID<n5bjhn$p4n$1@dont-email.me>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
PGPAndrzej Matuch
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (32m) > Slimer
Snit (2h & 20m)

On 2015-12-22 2:49 AM, Sandman wrote:

Sandman
In article <D29DDC58.67A51%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[1359] That is your claim. Or part of it.

Sandman
No, this is my claim:

"The comment was made by your wife"

And this is my support:

<>

To compare, this is your claim:

"The comment is not from anyone in my family"

And here is your support:

<crickets>

As such, my claim has been supported, yours has not. Thus, my claim validity is full, yours is empty.

I am honestly surprised that Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent is still standing by the claim that the comment wasn't made by his family. You would honestly have to be a Democrat to believe that kind of statement.

-- Slimer EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Mozilla & PETA supporter

Sandman (32m) > Slimer
Snit (2h & 20m)