Skip to main content
news

Snit digest 182 / 2015-12-21

Sandman
Google Google
SubjectSnit digest 182 / 2015-12-21
FromSandman
Date12/21/2015 07:27 (12/21/2015 07:27)
Message-ID<sandman-a92b57aa700fd1aea2280d1a15dd4c73@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSnit (22m) > Sandman
In article <D29C89EB.67935%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[1306] There are two accounts being talked of:

[1307] 1) The one linked in the article

Which FB account is that? Link, please.

[1307] 2) The one to what has been claimed is my wife's account

This one: <http://www.facebook.com/anne.glasser.37>?

[1308] You claim they are the same... as does Carroll. But your only [1308] "evidence" is you claim this to be the case.

CASE: Defendant statement: "The comment is not from anyone in my family"

Defense exhibit: <none>

Prosecution statement: "The comment was made by your wife"

Prosecution exhibit: <>

Defendant statement: You offer no support for this claim

Defense exhibit: <none>

Prosecution statement validated by exhibit that has yet to be disproven by the defense, statement stands. The court rests.

[1310] You, on the other hand, will not be honest (27) and admit you have [1310] no evidence of your claims.

Since making such an "admission" would be a lie, I obviously will not make it, since I have supported my statement with evidence, evidence you have yet to counter in any way.

[1310] You will continue to break your word.

What word? Quotes, please.

Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 0 65 | lying/lie 0 187 | incest 0 2 sex 0 0 | honorable 0 6 | honest 1 27 run 0 5 | css 0 11 | tilde 0 0

-- Sandman

Google
Snit (22m) > Sandman