Subject | Re: Snit digest 160 / 2015-12-17 |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/17/2015 20:36 (12/17/2015 12:36) |
Message-ID | <D2985CD6.673E7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (2h & 7m) > Snit |
SandmanNo. You never will. You are simply lying. I have challenged you to back your claim over and over and over and over and you just lie. You are a liar. There is no debate on this - you simply are lying.
In article <D2983EE7.6738D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1147] Sure he did... he claimed I did something I did not do.
[X] Unsubstantiated accusations (http://tinyurl.com/pojrtxt)
Please quote this.SnitSandman
[1148] He made a claim (and many others tied to that). The claims may or [1148] may not be accurate. But he has said that when someone makes a claim [1148] they should back the claim or rescind it... and he claimed he does [1148] so.
I will support any claim
I make when asked to do so by ways of someone challenging the claim. If you agree with the claim, I have no need to support it. All you have to do is quote my claim and challenge it, and I will gladly support it. Or retract it if I can not support it.This is a direct lie from you.
Repost without snipping content and without adding crap to track your own trolling. Until then it is clear your whole goal is simply to lie and troll.SnitSandman
[1149] Yet he refuses.
[X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/ncvfhl2)
I think I am going to start count how many times you match each of the Objective Trolling Criterias. Should be fun.SnitSandman
[1150] THAT is his lie (115). He refuses to keep his word.
At no point have I broken my word.SnitSandman
[1151] Who is or is not in my family, or what I or my family members have [1151] or have not done, is not relevant here in any way.
So why did you make explicit claims about what your family member have or have not done?
Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"The comment is not from anyone in my family..."SnitSandman
[1151] What is relevant is if Sandman will keep his word. And he [1151] NEVER will. He will lie (116). Repeatedly.
I never lie. That's what you do. Over and over again, fully quotable and fully proven.SnitSandman
[1153] Yet you cannot quote any such lie (118)
Doesn't it feel a bit fragile, even to you, when you keep making this claim when your lies have been shown, quoted and proven many times over - and you have been 100% unable to counter any of that proof?
I mean, if there was a scenario where you didn't run away and denied from your quotes being quoted, and you actually responded and tried to counter the proof, then you might have a small crippled leg to stand on - but for the last week or so I have quoted, shown and proven many of your lies, so this cut'n'paste line of yours just seem like an idiotic thing to keep saying even for you.
29 Snit: 0
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 44 | lying/lie 118 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 6 | honest 17 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0