Skip to main content
news

Re: Snit digest 190 / 2015-...

Ezekiel
SubjectRe: Snit digest 190 / 2015-12-22
FromEzekiel
Date12/22/2015 17:54 (12/22/2015 11:54)
Message-ID<n5bv2c$774$1@dont-email.me>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSlimer
FollowupsSlimer (10m)
Snit (21m)

"Slimer" <.m@nsn.s>wrote in message news:n5bued$4ev$1@dont-email.me...

Slimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256

On 2015-12-22 11:38 AM, Ezekiel wrote:

Ezekiel
"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote in message news:sandman-2a75128992b32d4c428aeab2c507b4c2@individual.net...

Sandman
In article <n5bjhn$p4n$1@dont-email.me>, Slimer wrote:

Snit
[1359] That is your claim. Or part of it.

Sandman
No, this is my claim:

"The comment was made by your wife"

And this is my support:

<>

To compare, this is your claim:

"The comment is not from anyone in my family"

And here is your support:

<crickets>

As such, my claim has been supported, yours has not. Thus, my claim validity is full, yours is empty.

Slimer
I am honestly surprised that Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent is still standing by the claim that the comment wasn't made by his family.

Sandman
I'm not. This is peanuts for Snit. When he makes a mistake, in this case making a claim he knows is untrue yet he thinks he has erased all traces,

Ezekiel
"Erased all traces" - except for the screenshot you have and the webpage that I most definitely saw with my own eyes. I suspect that other people also saw the Facebook post in the comments section of that page.

The shameless dishonest Michael Glasser can remove whatever post he wants to remove. But he can't change what was seen and what already happened.

Slimer
We all saw it, he just thinks that we're dumb enough to have forgotten what we saw. He has absolutely no respect for our intelligence. He sees himself as a highly-educated moral authority, even though his degrees most likely come from the bottom of a Cracker Jack box, and we're all too stupid to understand regular writing as well as images. We are also memory-impaired.

As the cliché goes - People simply aren't as stupid as Snit needs them to be.

In fact, HE is the complete idiot if he thinks for one second that his pathetic denials are fooling anyone.

-- "He (Ezekiel) made it clear he believed 50% or more of the people receiving disability should not be... he is attacking them as lazy scammers or whatever because they are *disabled*. It is offensive that he does so and it is in no way dishonest to call him out on it.

Piece of shit liar named Michael Glasser "Snit" "Prescott Computer Guy" Message-ID: <CE93F643.2421D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Slimer (10m)
Snit (21m)