Skip to main content
news

Snit digest 145 / 2015-12-16

Sandman
Google Google
SubjectSnit digest 145 / 2015-12-16
FromSandman
Date12/16/2015 20:00 (12/16/2015 20:00)
Message-ID<sandman-bf5c723d1580d4189f62da4e3436f53c@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSnit
In article <D296F45F.6724F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[1061] You say when you make a claim you should back it or take it back.

Only if it is challenged, of course. No need to support a claim that everyone agrees with, don't you agree?

[1062] Which are you going to do with this claim?

Are you challenging it? I want you to explicitly state that this is not the FB page of your wife:

<https://www.facebook.com/anne.glasser.37>

Before I substantiate my claim. And substantiate it I can.

Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 29 | lying/lie 86 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 2 | honest 7 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0

-- Sandman