Subject | Re: Sandman asks Snit for help to cyberstalk him! |
From | Steve Carroll |
Date | 12/18/2015 03:00 (12/17/2015 18:00) |
Message-ID | <2fa195f4-43c3-40df-bdfd-31ef5ae4c18c@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
SnitI had no idea you actually worked there because you lied about so many things for so long there was no reason to believe anything you wrote (there still isn't). It just didn't make sense that an alleged 'college professor' would engage in the kinds of crap you have while simultaneously pointing to the college you allegedly worked at. It made far more sense that you were an imposter trying to get someone in trouble. Your problem *today*, when you point to this quote of mine, is this idea *still* makes sense... to everyone but you.
On 12/17/15, 6:15 PM, in article n4vmi1$mln$1@dont-email.me, "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com>wrote:EzekielSnit
"Peter K�hlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>wrote in message news:n4vkkn$dbj$1@dont-email.me...Peter KohlmannEzekiel
Snit wrote:SnitPeter Kohlmann
On 12/17/15, 3:19 PM, in article n4vc7r$sbq$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s>wrote:SlimerSnit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Cyberstalking IS a serious crime. Carroll repeatedly contacts my employer, co-workers, family, clients, and more. He has admitted to at least some of this online, and others I have had clients forward his emails to me
Quit lying
"Carroll repeatedly contacts my employer, co-workers, family, clients, and more"
Uh-huh. And all the "proof" is in a screen-shot of a forged email to an anonymous newsgroup. Right?
Actually we have Carroll directly "promising" to contact my employer with a "promise" he would get me fired: