Google| Subject | Re: Snit digest 148 / 2015-12-17 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/17/2015 19:23 (12/17/2015 19:23) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-40e6b7ab883db72ba4c610f90d8a4b10@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (19m) > Sandman |
In article <D29833C8.67361%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
I guess not, no need to support it yet, then. Let me know if you want me to support it.SnitSandman
[1075] In response Sandman did neither
Are you challenging it?
Snit is still not challenging the claim, so need to support it. hence - he agrees with the claim.SnitSandman
[1076] Come on, Sandman, are you or are you not going to back your claim [1076] that the comment was from the account you claim?
First someone need to challenge the claim. Are you challenging it?
Still no actual response from Snit.SnitSandman
[1077] The answer, of course, is you never will. You will NOT keep your [1077] word and either back or rescind your claim. You will just ask ME to [1077] help you cyberstalk my family... help you figure out if you are on [1077] the right track or not.
Am I "cyberstalking your family" or am I asking you to identify the supposed imposter?Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>"The comment is not from anyone in my family..."
-- Sandman
12/15/2015-
-
-
