Subject | Re: Sandman asks Snit for help to cyberstalk him! |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/17/2015 17:47 (12/17/2015 09:47) |
Message-ID | <D298351A.67373%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | linuxiac |
Followups | Sandman (2h & 30m) |
linuxiacNotice how you cannot point to any such lies. The fact you make such baseless accusations shows you see me as one of the most honest and honorable people in COLA.
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:27:56 -0700, Snit wrote:Snitlinuxiac
On 12/16/15, 1:21 PM, in article D29715BF.67282%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:On 12/16/15, 12:12 PM, in article sandman-32248d2078695d434fe4e45096d2f1f2@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:No comment from Sandman about his lie. Sandman just pushed his standard obfuscations.SandmanSnit
In article <D29702F5.67262%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1067] One can create false Facebook profiles.
So you're explicitly stating that this is not the FB profile of your wife:
I did no such thing. You are lying.
Sandman has already exposed your lies snit. Why don't you just admit that you have been dishonest and move on. Take your socks with you when you leave.