Google| Subject | Re: Snit digest 188 / 2015-12-22 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/22/2015 08:55 (12/22/2015 08:55) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-78bd893d68417f62b24634527fd95765@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | -hh |
| Followups | -hh (4h & 41m) |
In article <93e0f784-e342-4eee-9e3c-c1a356f4fea2@googlegroups.com>, -hh wrote:
Of course, and since it is highly unlikely that Snit asked his wife to remove the comment, he's the one who did it. We already knows he is monitoring her email.-hhSnitSandman
[1342] I challenge you to back the claim that either my wife or I removed [1342] ANY relevant FB post.
Certainly. Already done, but here it is again: Before: <>After: <http://dcourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubsectionID=1&ArticleID=141927>
Obviously, someone with access to the account - - such as a home PC that was logged into the account - - had to have made that change.
If it wasn't Anne or Michael ... then who? Ohhh! It must have been the cat .. its not literally impossible, you know: it just requires just the right random walking across the keyboard to start:Nah, someone snuck into his house and did it :)
There ya go: it is merely just a half dozen or so "one in a million" events which must have followed in a very strict sequential order. For that to all occur at just the right time is vastly more plausible that than for Michael to actually ever just 'fess up! /SIndeed :)
-- Sandman
12/15/2015-
-
-
