Subject | Re: Snit digest 188 / 2015-12-22 |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/22/2015 05:34 (12/21/2015 21:34) |
Message-ID | <D29E20DA.67AA8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | -hh |
Followups | Sandman (3h & 23m) |
-hhYou just used more words to say less than I have seen done in a long time. Congrats, I guess.
Sandman wrote:Sandman-hh
Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1342] I challenge you to back the claim that either my wife or I removed [1342] ANY relevant FB post.
Certainly. Already done, but here it is again:
Before: <>
After: <http://dcourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubsectionID=1&ArticleID=141927>
Obviously, someone with access to the account - - such as a home PC that was logged into the account - - had to have made that change.
If it wasn't Anne or Michael ... then who? Ohhh! It must have been the cat .. its not literally impossible, you know: it just requires just the right random walking across the keyboard to start:
...first, the cat somehow launches the web browser
...then a walk got the above URL ... maybe from history, despite it being months
later - - and then a paw to hit <return>to launch loading the page.
... then scroll down...more, more, more...stop! Yup, to the comments section.
... then -- hmm, point/select ... probably a right-click smooch on the mouse?
... mouse navigational move to the pop-up menu (with this while still being mouse-down held?)
...hit and confirm delete.
There ya go: it is merely just a half dozen or so "one in a million" events which must have followed in a very strict sequential order. For that to all occur at just the right time is vastly more plausible that than for Michael to actually ever just 'fess up! /S
-hh