Google| Subject | Snit digest 148 / 2015-12-17 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/17/2015 07:20 (12/17/2015 07:20) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-b288fe4fcd71d91400241644ee6703f1@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (10h & 21m) > Sandman |
In article <D2971680.67286%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SnitAre you challenging it?
[1075] In response Sandman did neither
[1076] Come on, Sandman, are you or are you not going to back your claim [1076] that the comment was from the account you claim?First someone need to challenge the claim. Are you challenging it?
[1077] The answer, of course, is you never will. You will NOT keep your [1077] word and either back or rescind your claim. You will just ask ME to [1077] help you cyberstalk my family... help you figure out if you are on [1077] the right track or not.Am I "cyberstalking your family" or am I asking you to identify the supposed imposter?
Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"The comment is not from anyone in my family..."
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 29 | lying/lie 87 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 2 | honest 7 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0
-- Sandman
12/15/2015-
-
-
