Skip to main content
news

Re: Snit digest 190 / 2015-...

Slimer
SubjectRe: Snit digest 190 / 2015-12-22
FromSlimer
Date12/22/2015 18:04 (12/22/2015 12:04)
Message-ID<n5bvml$9a0$1@dont-email.me>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
PGPgpg: invalid radix64 character 3C skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=2c) gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 22 18:04:48 2015 CET gpg: using RSA key 8C057E07FFAEBFAE gpg: BAD signature from "Andrzej Matuch " [unknown] gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
FollowsEzekiel
FollowupsSnit (12m)

On 2015-12-22 11:54 AM, Ezekiel wrote:

Ezekiel
"Slimer" <.m@nsn.s>wrote in message news:n5buedev@dont-email.me...

Slimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256

On 2015-12-22 11:38 AM, Ezekiel wrote:

Ezekiel
"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote in message news:sandman-2a75128992b32d4c428aeab2c507b4c2@individual.net...

In article <n5bjhn$p4n@dont-email.me>, Slimer wrote:

Snit
[1359] That is your claim. Or part of it.

Sandman
No, this is my claim:

"The comment was made by your wife"

And this is my support:

<>

To compare, this is your claim:

"The comment is not from anyone in my family"

And here is your support:

<crickets>

As such, my claim has been supported, yours has not. Thus, my claim validity is full, yours is empty.

Slimer
I am honestly surprised that Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent is still standing by the claim that the comment wasn't made by his family.

Sandman
I'm not. This is peanuts for Snit. When he makes a mistake, in this case making a claim he knows is untrue yet he thinks he has erased all traces,

Ezekiel
"Erased all traces" - except for the screenshot you have and the webpage that I most definitely saw with my own eyes. I suspect that other people also saw the Facebook post in the comments section of that page.

The shameless dishonest Michael Glasser can remove whatever post he wants to remove. But he can't change what was seen and what already happened.

Slimer
We all saw it, he just thinks that we're dumb enough to have forgotten what we saw. He has absolutely no respect for our intelligence. He sees himself as a highly-educated moral authority, even though his degrees most likely come from the bottom of a Cracker Jack box, and we're all too stupid to understand regular writing as well as images. We are also memory-impaired.

Ezekiel
As the cliché goes - People simply aren't as stupid as Snit needs them to be.

In fact, HE is the complete idiot if he thinks for one second that his pathetic denials are fooling anyone.

He's about as effective a liar as Hillary Clinton is. I actually caught some of the snore-fest of a Democratic debate and I saw how the moderators asked her a question and she kept dodging it. It was like watching Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott rodent on the podium except that all three of the candidates are a lot more masculine than he is.

-- Slimer EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Mozilla & PETA supporter

Snit (12m)