Subject | Re: Snit digest 171 / 2015-12-20 |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/20/2015 21:29 (12/20/2015 13:29) |
Message-ID | <D29C5DD1.67905%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (1h & 24m) > Snit |
SandmanYou have claimed that your link and the link that was on the newspaper site are the same, but you have no support for this.
In article <D29BF3CE.6784C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SandmanSnitSnitSandman
[1233] I have not spoken of that account. Carroll is purposely conflating [1233] two different Facebook accounts to push obfuscation.
What's the "other" FB account?
The two being discussed. Of course.
So, "the other" is "the two"? I've only ever discussed one FB account, which is the other?