Subject | Re: Snit digest 165 / 2015-12-19 |
From | Steve Carroll |
Date | 12/20/2015 01:23 (12/19/2015 16:23) |
Message-ID | <e524ffd1-ae86-465e-9f5d-4346e69b8cfb@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Barry H (Snit) |
Followups | Marly Parlor (9m) > Steve Carroll |
Barry H (Snit)Read it again, egghead.
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 16:07:34 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote:Steve CarrollBarry H (Snit)
On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 2:10:27 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:SnitSteve Carroll
On 12/19/15, 1:49 PM, in article sandman-b0fb689c9d90691ed02753b088bbc7a7@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanSnit
In article <n54056$lv7$1@dont-email.me>, Slimer wrote:SlimerSandman
It's funny how Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent believes that the sudden disappearance of a comment Anne Glasser made on a Facebook page is NOT proof that it is his wife's page. Most people don't remove their Facebook comments, especially if they're not in any way controversial, unless someone points out that it is used against them somehow. In this case, because that comment made Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent look bad (as if that wasn't already possible), it was removed in an effort to delete the evidence. The very fact that it is suddenly no longer there makes it damned clear that "Anne Glasser" is not a fake page created by Steve Carroll.
Yeah, logic and panic never worked good for Snit. He wants to remove the comment yet also at the same time remove the comment, which a supposed forger obviously wouldn't do synced with Snit's realization that there was a comment from his wife online!
That is not even English.
Comes down to you and Carroll are pointing to one FB account and CLAIMING, with NO support, that this is the account that the comment came from.
Just your normal lying.
Wanna guess what Paula Lee says about it, Snit?
So snit is right about you contacting his wife's friends.
Logged. You aren't the brightest bulb in the box Carroll.?? Not that I had to... but I already said that if I felt it necessary to respond to your libelous statement on this FB b*llshit by trying to verify if you're lying or not I would. You're so goofy you're acting like I just admitted to something I should be ashamed of. LOL!