Skip to main content
news

Re: Snit digest 165 / 2015-...

Steve Carroll
SubjectRe: Snit digest 165 / 2015-12-19
FromSteve Carroll
Date12/20/2015 01:23 (12/19/2015 16:23)
Message-ID<e524ffd1-ae86-465e-9f5d-4346e69b8cfb@googlegroups.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsBarry H (Snit)
FollowupsMarly Parlor (9m) > Steve Carroll

On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 5:11:56 PM UTC-7, Snit (using his Barry H sock puppet) wrote:

Barry H (Snit)
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 16:07:34 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote:

Steve Carroll
On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 2:10:27 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:

Snit
On 12/19/15, 1:49 PM, in article sandman-b0fb689c9d90691ed02753b088bbc7a7@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <n54056$lv7$1@dont-email.me>, Slimer wrote:

Slimer
It's funny how Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent believes that the sudden disappearance of a comment Anne Glasser made on a Facebook page is NOT proof that it is his wife's page. Most people don't remove their Facebook comments, especially if they're not in any way controversial, unless someone points out that it is used against them somehow. In this case, because that comment made Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent look bad (as if that wasn't already possible), it was removed in an effort to delete the evidence. The very fact that it is suddenly no longer there makes it damned clear that "Anne Glasser" is not a fake page created by Steve Carroll.

Sandman
Yeah, logic and panic never worked good for Snit. He wants to remove the comment yet also at the same time remove the comment, which a supposed forger obviously wouldn't do synced with Snit's realization that there was a comment from his wife online!

Snit
That is not even English.

Comes down to you and Carroll are pointing to one FB account and CLAIMING, with NO support, that this is the account that the comment came from.

Just your normal lying.

Steve Carroll
Wanna guess what Paula Lee says about it, Snit?

Barry H (Snit)
So snit is right about you contacting his wife's friends.

Read it again, egghead.

Logged. You aren't the brightest bulb in the box Carroll.

?? Not that I had to... but I already said that if I felt it necessary to respond to your libelous statement on this FB b*llshit by trying to verify if you're lying or not I would. You're so goofy you're acting like I just admitted to something I should be ashamed of. LOL!

Think, if you can...

Why *wouldn't* I want to get to the bottom of this?

Why *wouldn't* you?

See your problem YET? C'mon... aren't you the least bit curious, Snit ;)