Skip to main content
news

Re: Snit digest 165 / 2015-...

Sandman
SubjectRe: Snit digest 165 / 2015-12-19
FromSandman
Date12/19/2015 21:49 (12/19/2015 21:49)
Message-ID<sandman-b0fb689c9d90691ed02753b088bbc7a7@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSlimer
FollowupsSnit (20m) > Sandman

In article <n54056$lv7$1@dont-email.me>, Slimer wrote:

Slimer
It's funny how Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent believes that the sudden disappearance of a comment Anne Glasser made on a Facebook page is NOT proof that it is his wife's page. Most people don't remove their Facebook comments, especially if they're not in any way controversial, unless someone points out that it is used against them somehow. In this case, because that comment made Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent look bad (as if that wasn't already possible), it was removed in an effort to delete the evidence. The very fact that it is suddenly no longer there makes it damned clear that "Anne Glasser" is not a fake page created by Steve Carroll.

Yeah, logic and panic never worked good for Snit. He wants to remove the comment yet also at the same time remove the comment, which a supposed forger obviously wouldn't do synced with Snit's realization that there was a comment from his wife online!

-- Sandman

Snit (20m) > Sandman