Subject | Re: Sandman asks Snit for help to cyberstalk him! |
From | linuxiac |
Date | 12/17/2015 17:33 (12/17/2015 16:33) |
Message-ID | <n4uo5f$fr$1@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (13m) chrisv (39m) |
SnitSandman has already exposed your lies snit. Why don't you just admit that you have been dishonest and move on. Take your socks with you when you leave.
On 12/16/15, 1:21 PM, in article D29715BF.67282%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:On 12/16/15, 12:12 PM, in article sandman-32248d2078695d434fe4e45096d2f1f2@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:No comment from Sandman about his lie. Sandman just pushed his standard obfuscations.SandmanSnit
In article <D29702F5.67262%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1067] One can create false Facebook profiles.
So you're explicitly stating that this is not the FB profile of your wife:
I did no such thing. You are lying.