Google| Subject | Re: Snit digest 171 / 2015-12-20 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/20/2015 22:54 (12/20/2015 22:54) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-dd0a7be3acd746457ae441554be6ba81@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (1h & 43m) > Sandman |
In article <D29C5DD1.67905%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
[X] Ignoring evidence (http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v) [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/ncvfhl2)SnitSandmanSnitSnitSandman
[1233] I have not spoken of that account. Carroll is [1233] purposely conflating two different Facebook accounts [1233] to push obfuscation.
What's the "other" FB account?
The two being discussed. Of course.
So, "the other" is "the two"? I've only ever discussed one FB account, which is the other?
You have claimed that your link and the link that was on the newspaper site are the same, but you have no support for this.
Remember: unsupported claims are NOT support.What's the "other" FB account you spoke about above?
-- Sandman
12/15/2015-
-
-
