Subject | Re: Snit digest 165 / 2015-12-19 |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/19/2015 18:21 (12/19/2015 10:21) |
Message-ID | <D29AE03F.67720%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Barry H (Snit) |
Followups | Steve Carroll (29m) |
It is actually evidence damning Carroll and Sandman. The idea one of them would remove a falsified post KNOWING about this idiotic circus of their is MUCH greater than someone who is not even a part of their circus happening to remove it right as they troll over it.SlimerBarry H (Snit)
It's funny how Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent believes that the sudden disappearance of a comment Anne Glasser made on a Facebook page is NOT proof that it is his wife's page. Most people don't remove their Facebook comments, especially if they're not in any way controversial, unless someone points out that it is used against them somehow. In this case, because that comment made Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent look bad (as if that wasn't already possible), it was removed in an effort to delete the evidence. The very fact that it is suddenly no longer there makes it damned clear that "Anne Glasser" is not a fake page created by Steve Carroll.
Poor logic on your end. What if Carroll removed it just for the very reason that people would wrongly assume it was snit removing it?