Subject | Re: Sandman asks Snit for help to cyberstalk him! |
From | Steve Carroll |
Date | 12/18/2015 17:56 (12/18/2015 08:56) |
Message-ID | <30898059-45cb-4eeb-a90e-a9134fde9223@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Slimer |
SlimerGood point. I'd forgotten about RR's involvement.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 =20 On 2015-12-17 9:48 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:Steve CarrollSlimer
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 7:31:37 PM UTC-7, Slimer wrote:SlimerSteve Carroll
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 =20 On 2015-12-17 9:26 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:Steve CarrollSlimer
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 7:17:07 PM UTC-7, Slimer wrote:SlimerSteve Carroll
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 =20 On 2015-12-17 9:05 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:Steve CarrollSlimer
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 6:44:10 PM UTC-7, Slimer=20 wrote:SlimerSteve Carroll
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 =20 On 2015-12-17 7:42 PM, Peter K=F6hlmann wrote:Peter KohlmannSlimer
Snit wrote: =20SnitPeter Kohlmann
On 12/17/15, 3:19 PM, in article=20 n4vc7r$sbq$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: =20SlimerSnit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 =20 On 2015-12-17 3:00 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:Steve CarrollSlimer
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 11:06:34 AM UTC-7, Slimer wrote:SlimerSteve Carroll
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 =20 On 2015-12-17 12:13 PM, chrisv wrote:SlimerchrisvSnit
some thing wrote:=20 Sandman wrote:SandmanSnit
=20 So you're explicitly stating that this is not the FB profile of your wife:
=20 I did no such thing. You are lying.
=20 Sandman did not lie. He made an inference, in the hope that you would finally stop your=20 evasions and confirm or deny that the FB profile in question was your wife's. =20 This was obvious to everyone, including you. =20 Another "Snit" bald-faced lie. Documented.
=20 I wonder who would be so pathetic as to create a "fake" profile of a woman called Anne Glasser in Arizona. None of us have the immaturity nor the time to do so.
=20 From up above in this thread, Snit told this whopper of a lie: =20 "Carroll has repeatedly planted claims from "me" or "my wife" for him to find later. Very well could be the same here... but even if not, my personal life is not in any way relevant to COLA." - Snit =20 This is similar to his delusion that I share an=20 account with cc. It's pretty obvious, to me, that Snit is an over-medicated, paranoid delusional. He's even trying to pin his wife's FB comment on me, as expected, but Sandman has done a good job of showing it is Mrs. Glasser's account. For his part, Snit is doing what he always does, lying his ass off.
=20 I'm not sure what he's so afraid of though.
=20 Cyberstalking IS a serious crime. Carroll repeatedly=20 contacts my employer, co-workers, family, clients, and more. He has admitted to at least some of this online, and others I have had clients forward his emails to me
=20 Quit lying
=20 He would have to have an employer before such a person could be contacted.
=20 Exactly... and as I said many times back then, there was no reason to believe anything Snit ever said about anything. He was posting about twice as much as he does now, the idea that he was working as a teacher, even part time, was so ridiculous it didn't pass the laugh test. =20 =20 =20Steve CarrollSlimerSnitPeter Kohlmann
He is a true and present danger to myself and my family.
=20 The only one endangering your family is you yourself. You are a parasite who has absolutely no qualms about spending the money needed for the upbringing and education of your child for yourself, in order to troll usenet 24/7 =20 =20 In fact, your family would be *much* better off if you were hit by a truck
=20 Much like a certain character in the Star Wars storyline, there is no value in having Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent around.
=20 I recently tried to watch the 3 movies made after the original trilogy... I didn't like them very much.
=20 Only the last one was passable and then only because Natalie=20 Portman dies. I'm sure the new one is good (as a result of=20 Disney's involvement), but Star Wars isn't a religion to me; I'd rather watch original content.
=20 Are you going to the new one (I think it premieres tonight)?
=20 I'll wait until it plays on The Movie Network. I don't have as much interest in IT as I do in the H8ful Eight. Tarantino is the man and every single one of his movies gets my attention, not science-fiction.
=20 I generally like his stuff but movies like Grindhouse are too wacky.
=20 Well, those movies seemed to be some sort of collaboration with Robert Rodriguez and I don't consider them to be "Tarantino movies" necessarily. Rodriguez, IMO, is a complete loser and his movies are total garbage so I tend to stay away from them or anything which even hints that he was involved.