Skip to main content
news

Re: Snit digest 165 / 2015-...

Steve Carroll
SubjectRe: Snit digest 165 / 2015-12-19
FromSteve Carroll
Date12/20/2015 01:06 (12/19/2015 16:06)
Message-ID<cad8f24f-dbb6-4195-9fa3-3e2156f7c8ea@googlegroups.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSandman
Followupslinuxiac (1h & 45m)

On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 4:43:22 PM UTC-7, Sandman wrote:

Sandman
In article <D29B15C9.67795%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Yeah, logic and panic never worked good for Snit. He wants to remove the comment yet also at the same time remove the comment, which a supposed forger obviously wouldn't do synced with Snit's realization that there was a comment from his wife online!

Snit
That is not even English.

Sandman
Agreed, that was a jumble, my bad. What I think I meant to say that logic and panic doesn't work good for you - you wanted to remove the comment while at the same time blame the comment on someone else, but if the comment had remained, you couldn't do that. But by removing the comment you reduced the likelihood of it being made by a forger, since this supposed forger would have had no reason to remove the comment at the same time it was brought to your attention.

Snit
Comes down to you and Carroll are pointing to one FB account and CLAIMING, with NO support, that this is the account that the comment came from.

Sandman
Claiming + support, that is. Remember, support can be wrong, support can be disproven, but support is support. Just ignoring it won't make it go away, just merely claiming it may or can be a forgery doesn't make it one. The comment was made by your wife, and that is a claim that has been supported, something you have yet to disprove. Or as John said back in august: <XnsA4F3BD0F93AD1johngrubor@178.63.61.145> "The comment was made by your wife, Anne, using a Facebook account, since that site uses Facebook Comments. Her name and photo link back to a fairly closed profile but there's enough there to know who she is. One of the family members she discloses is a male by the last name of Glasser, and Facebook lists her relationship with him as him being her brother in law, so it's obviously your brother. Unless someone has managed to set up a fake Anne Glasser Facebook page and hoodwink your family members, Snit. How likely is that? It's your spouse in that comment thread bemoaning her never ending workload, and you should hang your head in shame for being a lazy bastard." It's not like this was a secret or anything. I'm not the only one that correctly pointed it out.

It's not a fake account. Why would his own brother *still* be linked to it months later? Why would any of Anne Glasser's friends *still* be? Notably, Snit tried to remove the reference to Paula Lee Bright after I brought it up recently (and I pointed to a screenshot of it). Unfortunately, for him, he wasn't able to completely remove *all* internal FB references to it (they always seem to have all kinds of 'tentacles' to things, weird). Here's another screenshot taken just now:

<http://imgur.com/TS3hWng>

linuxiac (1h & 45m)