Subject | Re: Snit digest 190 / 2015-12-22 |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/22/2015 16:57 (12/22/2015 08:57) |
Message-ID | <D29EC107.67B15%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Slimer |
SlimerI have openly noted now that Sandman or Carroll or whomever has removed it I cannot show what account it came from. Nor can anyone else. And, really, it does not matter one whit - has nothing to do with COLA.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2015-12-22 2:49 AM, Sandman wrote:SandmanSlimer
In article <D29DDC58.67A51%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1359] That is your claim. Or part of it.
No, this is my claim:
"The comment was made by your wife"
And this is my support:
<>
To compare, this is your claim:
"The comment is not from anyone in my family"
And here is your support:
<crickets>
As such, my claim has been supported, yours has not. Thus, my claim validity is full, yours is empty.
I am honestly surprised that Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent is still standing by the claim that the comment wasn't made by his family. You would honestly have to be a Democrat to believe that kind of statement.