Google| Subject | Snit digest 192 / 2015-12-23 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 12/23/2015 00:12 (12/23/2015 00:12) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-5453bed329fb3af68a7aeb7077605040@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (14m) > Sandman |
In article <D29ECD22.67B46%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SnitCASE: Defendant statement: "The comment is not from anyone in my family"
[1376] Sandman posts his image over and over and over and over... trying to [1376] burn the image into your mind. But what account was that comments [1376] tied to.
Defense exhibit: <none>
Prosecution statement: "The comment was made by your wife"
Prosecution exhibit: <
>Defendant statement: You offer no support for this claim
Defense exhibit: <none>
Prosecution statement validated by exhibit that has yet to be disproven by the defense, statement stands. The court rests.
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 0 79 | lying/lie 1 209 | incest 0 2 sex 0 0 | honorable 0 7 | honest 0 29 run 0 5 | css 0 11 | tilde 0 0
-- Sandman
12/15/2015-
-
-
