Subject | Re: Snit digest 165 / 2015-12-19 |
From | Marly Parlor |
Date | 12/20/2015 01:32 (12/20/2015 00:32) |
Message-ID | <n54sv9$43f$1@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Steve Carroll |
Followups | Steve Carroll (13m) Snit (1h & 57m) |
Steve CarrollYour problem is you wrote: " Wanna guess what Paula Lee says about it, Snit?" which implies that you already know Paula has said which means you have been in contact with her. Your lame attempt at obfuscation won't work Carroll.
On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 5:11:56 PM UTC-7, Snit (using his Barry H sock puppet) wrote:Barry H (Snit)Steve Carroll
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 16:07:34 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote:Steve Carroll
On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 2:10:27 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:Snit
On 12/19/15, 1:49 PM, in article sandman-b0fb689c9d90691ed02753b088bbc7a7@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:Sandman
In article <n54056$lv7$1@dont-email.me>, Slimer wrote:Slimer
It's funny how Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rode
ntSteve CarrollSlimer
believes that the sudden disappearance of a comment Anne Glasser mad
e on aSteve CarrollSlimer
Facebook page is NOT proof that it is his wife's page. Most people d
on'tSteve CarrollSlimer
remove their Facebook comments, especially if they're not in any way controversial, unless someone points out that it is used against the
mSteve CarrollSlimer
somehow. In this case, because that comment made Snit Jar Jar Glasse
r lyingSteve CarrollSlimer
imbecile and Prescott Rodent look bad (as if that wasn't already pos
sible),Steve CarrollSlimer
it was removed in an effort to delete the evidence. The very fact th
at it isSteve CarrollSlimer
suddenly no longer there makes it damned clear that "Anne Glasser" i
s not aSteve CarrollSlimerSandman
fake page created by Steve Carroll.
Yeah, logic and panic never worked good for Snit. He wants to remove
theSteve CarrollSandman
comment yet also at the same time remove the comment, which a suppose
d forgerSteve CarrollSandman
obviously wouldn't do synced with Snit's realization that there was a
commentSteve CarrollSandmanSnit
from his wife online!
That is not even English.
Comes down to you and Carroll are pointing to one FB account and CLAIM
ING,Steve CarrollBarry H (Snit)SnitSteve Carroll
with NO support, that this is the account that the comment came from.
Just your normal lying.
Wanna guess what Paula Lee says about it, Snit?
So snit is right about you contacting his wife's friends.
Read it again, egghead.Barry H (Snit)Steve Carroll
Logged. You aren't the brightest bulb in the box Carroll.
?? Not that I had to... but I already said that if I felt it necessary to respond to your libelous statement on this FB b*llshit by trying to verify if you're lying or not I would. You're so goofy you're acting like I just admitted to something I should be ashamed of. LOL!
Think, if you can...
Why *wouldn't* I want to get to the bottom of this?
Why *wouldn't* you?
See your problem YET? C'mon... aren't you the least bit curious, Snit ;)