Subject | Re: Snit digest 154 / 2015-12-17 |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/20/2015 14:30 (12/20/2015 06:30) |
Message-ID | <D29BFB9F.67869%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (8h & 31m) |
SandmanAll those unquotable lies from me. Horrid! Meanwhile above you are shown to break your word (lie) multiple times.
In article <D2983A09.67386%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1118] Most people in COLA know that to be the case - including you. That [1118] is unless you claim to be too stupid to see Sandman's many lies [1118] (103) and how he fails to show any from me.
Several lies from you fully quoted and fully supported in the last few days. Your response: Denial. No counter argument, no counter support, nothing. Just full on denial mode.
So much for the supposed "unquotable" lies of yours, huh? Turns out, they were super easy to both quote, show and prove.
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 42 | lying/lie 103 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 5 | honest 14 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0