Skip to main content
news

Snit digest 188 / 2015-12-22

Sandman
Google Google
SubjectSnit digest 188 / 2015-12-22
FromSandman
Date12/22/2015 00:33 (12/22/2015 00:33)
Message-ID<sandman-54208247d09c29ac8b3c4f901ad47898@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSnit (8m) > Sandman
-hh (4h & 48m) > Sandman
In article <D29DD3FE.67A3C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[1342] I challenge you to back the claim that either my wife or I removed [1342] ANY relevant FB post.

Certainly. Already done, but here it is again:

Before: <>

After: <http://dcourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubsectionID=1&ArticleID=141927>

[1343] You will, of course, fail. Your "support" will be to say you claim [1343] it is true

Of course not, I will support it with undisputed evidence.

[1346] That is you simply making a claim.

No, that's me supporting my claim with evidence. Evidence you have yet to counter in any shape or fashion.

Oh, you forgot to answer the question for the fourth time:

What "other" Facebook account?

Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 0 71 | lying/lie 0 201 | incest 0 2 sex 0 0 | honorable 0 6 | honest 0 28 run 0 5 | css 0 11 | tilde 0 0

-- Sandman

Google
Snit (8m) > Sandman
-hh (4h & 48m) > Sandman