Subject | Re: Snit digest 165 / 2015-12-19 |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/19/2015 21:43 (12/19/2015 13:43) |
Message-ID | <D29B0F9E.67787%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Marly Parlor |
Marly ParlorI did report both he and his girlfriend. Turns out it is based on how the local police want to deal with it. His girlfriend, who publicly accused me of making harassing calls and even raping her (even though as far as I know we have not been within 100 miles of each other) was contacted by her police and told that these were actions which I could prosecute her for if I choose. I had documented her actions very well and gave the content to the police (and since then it has become public). Without going into more details she stopped. She has not harassed me for years.
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote in news:D29AFEFE.6776F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com:SnitMarly Parlor
On 12/19/15, 12:15 PM, in article n54abj$sks$2@dont-email.me, "Marly Parlor" <lingdingwah@teachers.org>wrote:SnitlinuxiacMarly Parlor
Here is Anne Glasser on Google Images. Search images for Anne Glasser +wickaboo.
https://www.google.com/search?q=anne+glasser% 2Bwickaboo&biw=1440&bih=611&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjv-4 _7 wejJAhUJHx4KHadZAgQQ_AUIBigB#imgrc=bPQ56zWgHi9_kM %3A
Now visit the page and like magic it's the same person you have in your picture.
https://plus.google.com/117713249022923895514
So now Sandman or you have managed to fake snit's Wickaboo Daycare site as well?
Give up snit Michael Glasser, this seals your coffin and truly exposes you as the slimeball, dishonest liar you are.
More of Carroll and Sandman's trolling efforts. Better capture the images before they remove them and blame snit.
More evidence of serious cyberstalking.
I fail to understand why you haven't reproted Carroll's stalking already?
He's been at it for 10+ years and that in and of itself probably qualifies for a cyberstalking case.Absolutely... esp. since I have only responded to him directly one since 2009, and that was in 2011. If I was still responding to him he would have a case that my responses were a sign I was not feeling threatened by his behavior (I very much do and expect him to show up at my house some day with the intent to harm me or my family).
The problem is people like Carroll are usually harmless until they take it to the next level, contacting you or your family in person, at which point they become dangerous. Steve Carroll seems unstable enough to do that which worries me. I would begin gathering the evidence in preperation for going to the authorities. You never know when he does actually take it to the next level so you need to be prepared.One "weakness" I have is I am open and honest and have let on to much of what I do have on him... though not all.