Subject | Snit digest 160 / 2015-12-17 |
From | Sandman |
Date | 12/17/2015 20:29 (12/17/2015 20:29) |
Message-ID | <sandman-0509ab90a685a143507681737b4036f9@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (7m) > Sandman |
Snit[X] Unsubstantiated accusations (http://tinyurl.com/pojrtxt)
[1147] Sure he did... he claimed I did something I did not do.
[1148] He made a claim (and many others tied to that). The claims may or [1148] may not be accurate. But he has said that when someone makes a claim [1148] they should back the claim or rescind it... and he claimed he does [1148] so.I will support any claim I make when asked to do so by ways of someone challenging the claim. If you agree with the claim, I have no need to support it. All you have to do is quote my claim and challenge it, and I will gladly support it. Or retract it if I can not support it.
[1149] Yet he refuses.[X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/ncvfhl2)
[1150] THAT is his lie (115). He refuses to keep his word.At no point have I broken my word.
[1151] Who is or is not in my family, or what I or my family members have [1151] or have not done, is not relevant here in any way.So why did you make explicit claims about what your family member have or have not done?
[1151] What is relevant is if Sandman will keep his word. And he [1151] NEVER will. He will lie (116). Repeatedly.I never lie. That's what you do. Over and over again, fully quotable and fully proven.
[1153] Yet you cannot quote any such lie (118)Doesn't it feel a bit fragile, even to you, when you keep making this claim when your lies have been shown, quoted and proven many times over - and you have been 100% unable to counter any of that proof?