Subject | Snit digest 185 / 2015-12-21 |
From | Sandman |
Date | 12/21/2015 10:16 (12/21/2015 10:16) |
Message-ID | <sandman-3c470792f79c579f744087679942eca8@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (5h & 35m) > Sandman |
SnitWhat link did it have?
[1320] It is no longer available. It has been removed.
[1321] You made the unsupported claim *I* removed it.[X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/ncvfhl2)
[1321] You never rescinded that claim. You broke your word.What word?
[1322] That is the one which is claimed to be my wife's page.Not claimed, shown. It has been shown to be your wife's page. Also, it has been shown that this is the account that made the comment. It hasn't been shown that there exists some "other" Facebook account that also made a comment on the page in question.
[1323] Right: there is no evidence one way or the other. I agree. No [1323] statement from me pretending there is. No lies (189) from me.Indeed - no support for your claim.
[1324] You make a claim with NO support other than the idea you made the [1324] claim.Incorrect, I made a claim and then I supported that claim. You know, the thing you never do.
[1326] Anyway, talking to you is a waste of time - your goal is clearly to [1326] lie (191) and troll (68) and get attention. You continue to break [1326] your word and alter the text you respond to, even in the post I am [1326] responding to.[X] Unsubstantiated accusations (http://tinyurl.com/pojrtxt)
[1327] Your word to back or rescind your claims.When was that "word" given? Why can't you link to this?
[1328] And with this we have gone over the same info many, many timesThis is the info: