Skip to main content
news

Snit digest 155 / 2015-12-17

Sandman
Google Google
SubjectSnit digest 155 / 2015-12-17
FromSandman
Date12/17/2015 19:08 (12/17/2015 19:08)
Message-ID<sandman-fffea7f03601a200d8eac854af11629a@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSnit
In article <D29832B6.6735E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Sandman
Incorrect. You even said please:

Snit 07/04/2006 10:05:37 AM <C0CF6F61.53F03%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>

"please support your claims of who does and does not have any network of people calling whoever names..."

Snit
[1122] And then you used that as an excuse to push a bunch of lies (104)

No "lies", nor was it an "excuse". All quotes you asked for were fully substantiated with links to the original for anyone to double check.

[1122] something I did NOT ask for.

You asked nicely for support about who says what about whom. I delivered exactly that.

[1122] You lied (105). It really is that simple. And you lie (106) [1122] again every time you say I am the one who asked you to be so [1122] dishonest (15).

Only, I never claimed you asked me to be dishonest. I correctly claim that you asked me nicely to show you who were calling whom "names". It's in the records, you really can't deny it.

Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 42 | lying/lie 106 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 5 | honest 15 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0

-- Sandman