Barry H (Snit)
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 09:34:23 -0500, Slimer wrote:

Slimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256

On 2015-12-22 9:10 AM, Sandman wrote:

Sandman
In article <n5bjhn$p4n$1@dont-email.me>, Slimer wrote:

Snit
[1359] That is your claim. Or part of it.

Sandman
No, this is my claim:

"The comment was made by your wife"

And this is my support:

<>

To compare, this is your claim:

"The comment is not from anyone in my family"

And here is your support:

<crickets>

As such, my claim has been supported, yours has not. Thus, my claim validity is full, yours is empty.

Slimer
I am honestly surprised that Snit Jar Jar Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent is still standing by the claim that the comment wasn't made by his family.

Sandman
I'm not. This is peanuts for Snit. When he makes a mistake, in this case making a claim he knows is untrue yet he thinks he has erased all traces, he will start his Snit Circus when it is proven he is lying. It's been done so many times it can't be counted. I've digestified quite a few of them over the years.

Slimer
He is a true Democrat, like that idiotic site "Politifact" which claimed that most of what Donald Trump has said over the past few months is a lie all the while never providing any evidence that any of it is untrue. He makes stuff up as he goes along and ensures that it fits his agenda, just like the Democrats do. It's pathetic but it doesn't surprise me that he is going to vote for a serial criminal like Hillary or a cowardly ass kisser like Bernie Sanders since he is basically a mix of both.

- -- Slimer

Barry H (Snit)
You can't talk about technology so you lash out and attack.