Skip to main content
news

Re: Snit digest 144 / 2015-...

Steve Carroll
SubjectRe: Snit digest 144 / 2015-12-16
FromSteve Carroll
Date12/16/2015 22:22 (12/16/2015 13:22)
Message-ID<58c546e0-09e9-4417-a6a0-164cce7e2415@googlegroups.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSlimer
FollowupsSlimer (48m) > Steve Carroll

On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 11:14:23 AM UTC-7, Slimer wrote:

Slimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-12-16 1:02 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:

Steve Carroll
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 10:44:53 AM UTC-7, Sandman wrote:

Sandman
In article <D296D887.6722F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[1056] Do not even know what I am being accused of lying (86) about...

Sandman
I'll try to be more clear. This is your claim:

Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

"The comment is not from anyone in my family..."

"The comment" was a comment on a web page that was made by this profile account:

<https://www.facebook.com/anne.glasser.37>

Thus, you are claiming that this is not your wife.

Snit
[1056] but what is clear is, again, Sandman is cyberstalking me.

Sandman
"Cyberstalking"? It was just a matter of clicking the profile link of the person making the comment. Since you denied it was made by your wife, I got curious and clicked the profile. If it isn't your wife, then how could I be stalking *you*?

Snit
[1056] It is creepy and, frankly, scary that he and Carroll do so. [1056] In this case Sandman is claiming Carroll is trying to or has [1056] friended people he says are family members of mine.

Sandman
The person that has the aforementioned FB page has set two persons as her relatives, which just so happens to be your siblings. I thought perhaps you wanted to let them know that they have agreed to be set as "sister in law" and "brother in law" to an imposter. I was doing you a service.

Not only that - this person has duped you as well:

<https://www.facebook.com/MichaelGlasser>

Steve Carroll
It's just another one of his 'unquotable' lies <eyeroll>.

We all know his bullcrap often doesn't' even make any sense, for example:

"He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved." - Snit

He's claiming he 'proved' something here, which is ridiculous by itself. But look at the other BS he tossed in about how "someone in the Denver area has tried to hack" his account" multiple times". My IP address is from Colorado and I make no attempt to hide it. Why would I use it to break the law with? Snit would have the reader believe that I use TOR to post to COLA with while 'forging' myself, yet, when I do the much more serious crime of hacking into someone's account I use an IP address that can be traced to Denver. This is even more bizarre than his delusion that cc and I 'share' a Google account. The guy is obviously so over-medicated he can't think straight; he just throws everything against the wall to see what sticks, even if it defies common sense.

Slimer
Why are we still talking about Snit Michael Glasser lying imbecile and Prescott Rodent?

I don't know about you but, for my part, it's 'cuz he still asks for proof of his "wrongs". Well, that and I promised him I would ;)