Subject | Re: Snit digest 159 / 2015-12-17 |
From | Snit |
Date | 12/17/2015 23:04 (12/17/2015 15:04) |
Message-ID | <D2987F68.67429%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
SandmanYou snipped, ran, refused to back your claim, and now want me to back other claims. And as you do so you put in tons of crap to obfuscate the discussion and better track your own trolling.
In article <D298508A.673C0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1139] Sandman made claims about a comment.
Quite the contrary - YOU made a claim about a comment:
Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"The comment is not from anyone in my family..."SnitSandman
[1139] I challenged him to back his claims.
First - quote the claims I made about that comment.
Secondly - quote your supposed "challenge" to those supposed claims.
If you fail to do either - this is yet another outright lie of yours.SnitSandman
He never did...
I will back any claim I make when and if they are questioned. I don't make claims I can't support, as we all know.SnitSandman
[1139] not did he rescind them.
No need when I can support them. All you have to do is challenge the claim and I will fully support it. I have to wonder why you are so afraid of challenging the claim.SnitSandman
[1144] Sandman will NEVER back his claims or keep his word.
Translation: Sandman always supports his claims, so you Snit is afraid to challenge them because it will further expose his lie.
28 Snit: 0
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 44 | lying/lie 114 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 6 | honest 17 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0