Google| Subject | Re: Sandman fan fiction digest 144 / 2015-12-16 |
| From | linuxiac |
| Date | 12/17/2015 17:35 (12/17/2015 16:35) |
| Message-ID | <n4uo8g$fr$2@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Slimer (16m) Snit (5h & 13m) |
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:28:14 -0700, Snit wrote:
SnitFalse statement with regards to Sandman. True statement with regards to snit.
On 12/16/15, 10:58 AM, in article D296F45F.6724F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:On 12/16/15, 10:44 AM, in article sandman-29a3639428bc42e0d5b2cedfd4608e82@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:Sandman replied with his normal trolling filled with massive obfuscation... but comes down to he will do NEITHER. He will not back his claim nor take it back.SandmanSnit
In article <D296D887.6722F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[1056] Do not even know what I am being accused of lying (86) about...
I'll try to be more clear. This is your claim:
Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"The comment is not from anyone in my family..."
"The comment" was a comment on a web page that was made by this profile account:
<https://www.facebook.com/anne.glasser.37>
Thus, you are claiming that this is not your wife.
You say when you make a claim you should back it or take it back.
Which are you going to do with this claim?
In other words, he will not keep his word. Ever. Sandman is proved dishonest. Again.False statement with regards to Sandman. True statement with regards to snit.
You seem to be describing yourself here Michael.
12/15/2015-
-
-
